Compare And Contrast Essay For Beowulf And King Arthur

Arthur Versus Beowulf: A Heroic Comparison

  • Length: 1063 words (3 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓
One of the main topics discussed in lesson one is the fact that heroes over time and overseas all heroes have something in common; which is true in the case of King Arthur and Beowulf. It is obvious that they are similar in the fact that they are both heroes, but what makes them an idol of their time and in their culture are poles apart. There are many things that are different about Beowulf and King Arthur, but the ones that stand out the most are what kind of hero they are and what actions they did to make them heroic. Both heroes possess qualities that others do not have, but it is what they do with those abilities that prompts someone to write a story about them and idolize them in time.
King Arthur and Beowulf are both Heroes that stories originated in the England area. They were written at different times, by a different era of people, but some of the core ethics are present in both stories. Both heroes were admired because they saved a whole group of people. King Arthur and Beowulf were also leaders, Beowulf was king of the Geats, and Arthur was the king of England. This is interesting because this means that they were both well known even before they had stories written about them, and they both possess qualities that can be found in leaders. While Arthur is a romance hero and Beowulf is an epic hero, the use of a magical weapon is seen in both stories which is generally a characteristic in the romance stories. "Then he saw, hanging on the wall, a heavy sword, hammered by the giants, strong and blessed with their magic,…" 242-244 Beowulf. Arthur's magical weapon is Excalibur, which is pretty much well known to anyone that has heard of his story. I also felt that fate had a role in both of the stories. In Arthur's dream he had a premonition about what was going to happen to his people, "Below him, many fathoms deep, was a dark well, an in the water swam serpents, dragons, and wild beasts. Suddenly the scaffold tilted and Arthur was flung into the water, where all the creatures struggled towards and began tearing him from limb to limb." Malory 194. The beasts and dragons were the two armies and when someone drew their sword Arthur, who was connected to his people was thrown in.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Arthur Versus Beowulf: A Heroic Comparison." 123HelpMe.com. 14 Mar 2018
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=160938>.

LengthColor Rating 
A Comparison of Beowulf and Sir Gawain Essay example - A Comparison of Beowulf and Sir Gawain A hero is someone who is idealized for his courage and noble qualities. Beowulf and Sir Gawain can certainly be called heroes. They both have many qualities that are expected of heroic knights and warriors. They are both brave, gallant, and skilled men, but are they the perfect heroes their people believe them to be. While they are portrayed as perfect heroes and they possess many heroic qualities, Beowulf and Sir Gawain are far from perfect. Beowulf and Gawain are shown as great leaders....   [tags: Compare, Contrast, Comparative]802 words
(2.3 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
True Heroes in Literature Essay - Throughout history, there have always been heroes. Those strong-willed, brave individuals who perform courageous acts for fame and glory are prevalent in most cultures.. Societies have these heroes as standards of their cultures’ moral codes. Every society has their own definition of these codes are, so a unifying definition of hero can be hard to achieve. However, Philip Zimbardo says “Simply put, then, the key to heroism is a concern for other people in need—a concern to defend a moral cause, knowing there is a personal risk, done without expectation of reward.” With this basic definition, I will be examining various epic heroes I’ve studied throughout the course of my senior year for char...   [tags: Comparison, History, Heroic Characteristics]
:: 9 Works Cited
1336 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay Comparing the Role Models in Beowulf and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight - Role Models in Beowulf and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight Excellence has always been a virtue revered by society. Writers throughout the ages have tried to capture the essence of excellence in their works, often in the form of a title character, who is the embodiment of perfection, encapsulating all the ideal traits necessary for one to be considered an excellent member of society. However, the standards for excellence are not universally agreed upon. On the contrary, one man's idea of excellence may very well be another's idea of mediocrity....   [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]
:: 3 Works Cited
2249 words
(6.4 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
The Epic of Beowulf is an Heroic Elegy Essay - Beowulf is an Heroic Elegy     There is considerable debate as to whether the poem Beowulf is an epic narrative poem or an heroic elegy, a poem celebrating the fantastic achievements of its great hero, and also expressing sorrow or lamentation for the hero’s unfortunate death. This essay intends to show that the poem is an heroic elegy.   In “Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics” Tolkien states:    We must dismiss, of course, from mind the notion that Beowulf is a “narrative poem,” that it tells a tale or intends to tell a tale sequentially....   [tags: Epic of Beowulf Essay]
:: 17 Works Cited
3262 words
(9.3 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
The Epic Poem, Beowulf - Beowulf and Heroic Virtues Essay - Beowulf and Heroic Virtues      Although the main character in Beowulf is Beowulf himself, I believe that the single section which most concisely illustrates the heroic values in this poem occurs on pages 61 through 64 of the text, and is illustrated not by Beowulf's actions, but by Wiglaf's. Although Wiglaf is by nationality Swedish, he identifies himself as Beowulf's kinsman when he says "I did begin to help my kinsman." (Chickering 64)   Wiglaf, in coming to Beowulf's aid in the fight against the dragon, typifies several important heroic virtues....   [tags: Epic of Beowulf Essay]
:: 3 Works Cited
1196 words
(3.4 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Is Beowulf an Heroic Elegy or an Epic Narrative? Essay - Is Beowulf  an Heroic Elegy or an Epic Narrative.       There is considerable debate as to whether the poem Beowulf is an epic narrative poem or an heroic elegy. Which is it. This essay intends to present both sides of the story.   Some great literary scholars think that the poem is an heroic elegy, celebrating the fantastic achievements of its great hero, and also expressing sorrow or lamentation for the hero’s unfortunate death. In “Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics” Tolkien states:    We must dismiss, of course, from mind the notion that Beowulf is a “narrative poem,” that it tells a tale or intends to tell a tale sequentially....   [tags: Epic of Beowulf Essay]
:: 21 Works Cited
4713 words
(13.5 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Epic of Beowulf Essay - Beowulf as Heroic Archetype - Beowulf as Heroic Archetype Monsters, their mothers, and dragons. The epic poem Beowulf, author unknown, includes all these mystical creatures and an impervious protagonist after which the poem is named. As the main character in the poem, Beowulf exemplifies the heroic archetype physically, spiritually, and ethically. Beowulf is superior to the average person in many areas, among them physical strength. Throughout the poem, Beowulf accomplishes feats that no other man would be able to survive and proves his boundless might....   [tags: Epic Beowulf herobeo]
:: 1 Works Cited
687 words
(2 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Essay on Arthurian Legend - Arthurian Legend Even though the Arthur legend is hundreds of years old, our culture today is still fascinated with the idea of the Round Table and the love triangle between Arthur, Lancelot, and Guinevere. There are movies and books galore to read about the different takes on the legend of Arthur. However, it makes one wonder if our culture really understands the Arthurian legend. Especially in the movies the central idea of a literary work can be lost. Compared to Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur have movies lost sight of what the Arthurian legend tries to teach....   [tags: Arthur Malory Le Morte Essays]1500 words
(4.3 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Essay on A Comparison of Beowulf, Sir Gawain and King Arthur as Heroes - Beowulf, Sir Gawain and King Arthur - Three Heroes The three heroes discussed here, Beowulf, Sir Gawain and King Arthur, are heroes for different reasons. Beowulf, our earliest hero, is brave but his motivation is different than then other two. To Sir Gawain personal honor and valor is what is important. King Arthur, Sir Gawain's uncle, is naturally the quintessential king of the medieval period. Though all men to a certain extent share the same qualities, some are more pronounced than in the others....   [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]1082 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Beowulf Essay - Beowulf This essay will show how the epic Anglo-Saxon/Scandinavian poem Beowulf is part of the heroic culture seen all over Europe at that time. While the poem has been escribed to about the year 800, recent research has indicated beyond doubt that it was first written down between 1087 and 1090, as entertainment for the court of King Henry II. (Aubrey Beardsley, Beowulf: New Beginnings, 2001, p. 74) Of course, the late eleventh centry was merely when it was actually put to paper, the language of the poem shows that there are many parts that are much older, that probably date to the Celtic Iron Age of southern Norway....   [tags: Epic of Beowulf Essay]534 words
(1.5 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]

Related Searches

Beowulf         King Arthur         Heard         Comparison         Characteristic         Hanging         Epic Hero         Topics         Giants         Weapon        




The Anglo-Saxons believed that one could avoid fate as long as they did brave acts, but eventually it would catch up. Beowulf held it off for a long time but eventually accepted his fate in a very honorable way. The similarities between the two heroes are very general and hard to express upon. The differences are much more specific and even though they are differences relationships can still be drawn between each other.
The biggest difference between Arthur and Beowulf is what type of hero they are classified as in literature. Since The two stories were written at different times by people of a different culture the ideals of a hero were a little different, while they still had the same central ideas. During the time the story of Arthur was written chivalry was becoming a kind of lifestyle for an honorable person to live by, which brought about the era of the romance hero. The excerpt that was read of King Arthur was only a small part of his large and well known story, which did not show too much of the characteristics of a romance story but more the style of writing it was in. Though it did have one of the main characteristics that their disappearance is unknown and leaves room that they might one day return. "In Many parts of Britain it is believed that King Arthur did not die and that he will return to us and win fresh glory and the Holy cross of our lord Jesu Christ." Malory 200. Beowulf origins are unknown, all we know is that it was written in the time of the Anglo-Saxons, and that it was probably passed down by word of mouth before it was actually written. Beowulf is classified as an epic hero, he possess superior human strength, the highest ethical standards, and in his quest he must defeat monsters with dark powers. The difference between these types of heroes is that King Arthur could possibly be a real person, while Beowulf seams unrealistic. Though both characters were both heroes what sets them apart was their actions.
The stories themselves are what makes Beowulf and Arthur different. It was their actions that prompted someone write a story about them. Beowulf was not an ordinary human, he had super human strength and fought monsters. Even though he was extraordinary, a story about him might not have been written if he did not fight Grendel. Beowulf first helped out the Danes by fighting and Killing Grendel, a monster that had been at war with Hrothgar for 12 years. This was the start of Beowulf's legacy and the people began to glorify him. "Then old and young rejoiced, turned back From that happy pilgrimage, mounted their hard-hooved Horses, High-sprirted stallions, and rode them slightly toward Herot again, retelling Beowulf's bravery as they jogged along." Beowulf 143-147. Killing Grendel lead to Beowulf killing Grendel's mother and the dragon. King Arthur was not an ordinary person but he had no special ability over anyone else. The reason his legacy was made into a story is because he was such a great leader, and how he came to be leader. Everyone knows the story of King Arthur and the knights of the round table, but there are so many versions, and the only part of Malory's story that is in the text book is the very end. It can be assumed that King Arthur was a great leader because he had so many loyal fighters with him at the last battle.
Though King Arthur was a romance hero and Beowulf was epic hero, their actions are worthy of being retold. That is what all heroes have in common. In conclusion Beowulf and King Arthur are similar in the fact that they have both accomplished a great deal and deserve to be remembered through stories, though what they did to deserve this the honor, was very different.



King Arthur and Beowulf: Hero Analysis

Get Your
Essay Written

Starting at Just $13.90 a page

Outline

I. Introduction

II. What are the common heroic tendencies between King Arthur and Beowulf?

III. How do these tendencies affect their legends?

IV. Compare and contrast Beowulf as an epic hero with King Arthur being a romantic/chivalric hero

Introduction

Popular media and its related forms of entertainment and information – i.e. movies, television shows, etc – has served as an important tool not just to entertain the people but also to inform or educate the masses, to allow information to be transmitted from one generation to another. One of the important characteristics of this information transfer is the transfer of the knowledge about several different mythical and/or legendary icons that has impacted many generations.

From western literature, came two of the very popular male images that represent strong and significant socio-personal values: King Arthur and Beowulf. Both characters are included in the literary education of students for generations. Outside schools, films and movies pay tribute to King Arthur and Beowulf and immortalizing them even more through works on the silverscreen, pressing deeper into the consciousness of the people King Arthur and Beowulf and what they believe as actions of the two that made them important heroes of folkloric legends and myths.

King Arthur has been portrayed many times in many different movies, while recently Beowulf was brought to life again through the state of the art 3D movie making. Because of their seemingly ageless popularity, it cannot be helped that individuals would question the merit for the longevity of King Arthur and Beowulf’s personality as well as their myth and legend.

One certain thing is that for many, they were considered as heroes who exemplified the ideal human being. But is this existing concept of heroism of the two hold ground? How did the notion of heroism of King Arthur and Beowulf contributed to the intensity of their popularity that even today, people are still making efforts to feature their lives in works of fiction, works that honor them as heroic individuals?

The paper will focus on discussing the heroic tendencies of King Arthur and Beowulf and how these tendencies affected the legend of both characters, and also provide an integral analysis of the similarities and dissimilarities existing between King Arthur as a romantic/chivalric hero and Beowulf as an epic hero.

What are the common heroic tendencies between King Arthur and Beowulf?

King Arthur’s popularity even in the modern times was due largely to the fact that writers who presented King Arthur – starting from the authoritative work of Thomas Malory, the Le Morte De Arthur which is a “definitive version of the King Arthur epic (Rosenberg 547).” Up to the present, the public has somewhat banked on King Arthur’s personality as being constantly heroic for King Arthur to be generally loved and appreciated by the public.

Beowulf, “the great hero (Steinberg 36)”, also led a life that is characterized by various acts of heroism that made him a very popular legendary figure. Between the two, it was King Arthur who has a more complex heroic tendencies because the author is using King Arthur (directly or indirectly) as a way to deliver a political statement on what should be morally right, in reaction to real-life socio-political events.

Whereas Beowulf’s heroism was found in a life that was simpler – acting as a hero to save a group of people from monsters which ordinary humans cannot kill (and they were Grendel, Grendel’s mother and the dragon). If there were any other heroic tendencies for Beowulf, it would have come during his rule as king, something that is not stressed significantly though.

Swearing to the Pentecostal Oath so that King Arthur’s knights are guided by a code is one of King Arthur’s efforts to be heroic. The heroism here is found in the fact that King Arthur was trying to save the society by leading through example. And his example was the restoration of moral fiber, which he expects the society to find among his chivalric knights of the round table.

The time wherein King Arthur was born was no doubt filled with many violent and bloody episodes because the fight in the monarchial level when it comes to legitimacy to rule and ownership of land by blood and genealogy is characterized by the lack of moral fiber among the people; while the masses where also engulfed in the same behavior because this is what they see among their rulers and the nobles.

Through the popularization of the Pentecostal Oath and the knights being sworn to it, King Arthur made himself a hero of morals. One of the examples of the lack of moral fiber that King Arthur wishes to address through his heroic effort is the story “The Tale of Balyn and Balan” which featured the case of fratricide.

Another act of heroism is the act of saving the dignity of England from being trampled by foreign powers that demanded the allegiance of England as a country not equal to, but under them. An example of this case is the conflict of King Arthur with a certain Lucius, named as the Emperor of Rome who demanded that King Arthur and England pay tribute to Rome as was the tradition observed since the time of Julius Caesar, practiced by the more powerful country – which Rome believe as itself – and of the conquered countries, which Rome believe included England.

King Arthur tried to be a hero in the eyes of the public by going to war versus a kingdom which it believed insulted England. King Arthur’s warpath was the road towards the correction of such transgression towards England. His successful campaign in the battle cemented his hero status – something he owed largely for the outcome of his acts of violence and aggression, which are all politically motivated and hardly a result of personal and genuinely moral endeavors.

This act of heroism in the name of the kingdom was displayed – for the last time – during the Battle of Salibury, wherein King Arthur rode to fight Mordred who is believed as someone who does not have the right to rule England after Mordred usurped the throne from its rightful ruler. Again, King Arthur wished to win the mantle of heroism by risking his life so that rightful monarchial ruler and order is restored.

Another heroic act of King Arthur was during his fight with the giant in Mont St. Michel. This act was considered both chivalric and romantic, because it involved saving women and protecting of the sanctity of sex.

This was the same thread of heroism, heroism fueled by actions undertaken in the name of honor found in marriage and monogamous sexual practice as seen in King Arthur’s decision to punish Queen Guinevere’s infidelity by ordering Guinevere burned at the stake (which did not happen because Lancelot saved her) even if she is Arthur’s wife.

For Beowulf, there were just three basic and popular events in his life wherein his heroic tendencies were featured. First was his heroic tendency when the monster Grendel terrorized Heorot, a social hall of a Danish king. His second heroic tendency was his effort to stop the carnage laid against the same people after Grendel’s mother tried to avenge the death of Grendel.

It was in the same breadth, depth and perspective in terms of heroic tendency when it comes to talking about Beowulf’s demonstration of his last heroic tendency, and that is his fight with the dragon during his rule as king, so that he can save his people – an endeavor that eventually killed him.

Ultimately, the heroic tendencies of King Arthur and Beowulf are characterized by significant similar factors – the desire to save other people, the personal desire to show physical strength during their youth and live and die in the name of honor and sacrifice during their later years, and the desire for peace even when they resort to actions that are violent, since their violent actions are geared to stop the cause of greater and irrational violence.

How do these tendencies affect their legends?

The heroic tendencies of King Arthur and Beowulf had a significant impact on the legend of King Arthur and Beowulf – two western culture fictional characters. One of the ways that the heroic tendencies of King Arthur and Beowulf affected their own legends is by acting as an important inspirational content that has greatly improved the personality of both King Arthur and Beowulf.

Without their heroic tendencies, their legends may have not been as popular as they are today. But because many contemporary and popular media creators, thinkers, writers and film directors find the promise in the heroic tendencies of these two characters as something that the public will greatly appreciate for years to come.

King Arthur and Beowulf, and their legends, managed to endure (Bilz 3) because people cannot stop talking about their heroic tendencies. The masses are always in need of a hero and are always inspired by the life of a hero. And because King Arthur and Beowulf – through their heroic efforts – have been considered heroes by the public, their legend has not stop growing and is becoming more and more popular to more and more audience, even when some believe that the opposite was the case (Dixon 48).

Compare and contrast Beowulf as an epic hero with King Arthur being a romantic/chivalric hero

Despite the similarity of the heroic tendencies and the hero image of King Arthur and Beowulf, there are also some notable differences in King Arthur being a romantic and chivalrous hero and in Beowulf’s being an epic hero. One of their differences is that because King Arthur was a chivalrous and romantic hero, his escapades of heroism was always geared at making a statement affecting political and moral right.

On the other hand, Beowulf simply illustrated heroism as a result of how an individual reacts to a primeval sense of self preservation, the hero reacting to what he perceives as a threat, an evil, to what he perceives as existing right and normal life. His actions of heroism were not geared towards anything political or romantic.

The threat of Grendel was both a menace that needs to be removed because it upsets the normal social order of things – a typical approach to good versus evil, and Beowulf fighting the evil (Bjork, Niles 272). This is simply because he should sans other socio-political complexities, and at the same time a chance for Beowulf to test his strength as a person.

Beowulf’s escapades were bereft of the trappings and complexities that made King Arthur’s predicament more romantic and necessitated/buttressed the concept of chivalry. Another difference is that King Arthur’s heroism is enhanced and affected by his social status and the status quo; while for Beowulf, his heroic actions created the status quo and social perception of heroism based on Beowulf’s often solo expeditions, while King Arthur is hardly without his trusted Knights of the Round Table.

Another difference is how the two hero figures are viewed when it comes to the consideration of flaws. King Arthur had his share of flaws, especially political and personal, while some critics believe Beowulf had none (Greenfield, Brown 78).

But this is not to say that King Arthur and Beowulf lived very polar lives. On the contrary, these two heroes shared several similarities. One example is the similarity in the heroism of King Arthur and Beowulf hinged on the goal of helping another individual or a group of people in need, like the similar escapade of King Arthur (in Mont St. Michel battling the giant) and Beowulf (in his battles with Grendel, Grendel’s mother and the dragon).

Both heroes also showed restrain when it comes to sexual appetite. Despite their popularity as heroes and the availability of women to fill their bed, both King Arthur and Beowulf showed they are not very greedy heroes who would use their heroism to bed women, especially since women and women-themes are not significant in Beowulf since “the poem’s attitudes toward women…are famously ambiguous (Frantzen 71)”, and even when women and love are strong themes in the chivalrous and romantic society and time where King Arthur lived, “in which a lover is completely obedient to the wishes of his lady (Rosenberg 289).”

Despite the fact that many literary critics believe that the heroes King Arthur and Beowulf both have skeletons in their own closets owing to how their names and their reputations were dragged in analyses that implicated them in un-hero actions (like greed for material things, etc), the two personalities are successful in making themselves hero icons by using their accomplishments as important leverages so that the people can justify their love or admiration for them.

It was because their heroism both was made larger than life that King Arthur and Beowulf managed to travel through time ageless. There heroic tendencies remain something that people want to see in another people. Through it, they allowed people to have someone to idolize, while some use these images to create a symbolism of a personality; in some instances, the two images, particularly Beowulf, were believed to be created with heroic tendencies so that they can represent important social institutions, for example, religion (Fulk 9).

Works Cited

Bilz, Rachelle Lasky. Life Is Tough. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2004.

Bjork, Robert E. and Niles, John D. A Beowulf Handbook. University of Nebraska Press, 1997.

Dixon, William Macneile. (August 2008). English Epic and Heroic Poetry. BiblioLife, 2008.

Frantzen, Allen J. Speaking Two Languages: Traditional Disciplines and Contemporary

Theory in Medieval Studies. State University of New York Press, 1991.

Fulk, R.D. Interpretations of “Beowulf”: A Critical Anthology. Indiana University Press, 1991.

Greenfield, Stanley B., Brown, George H. Hero and Exile: The Art of Old English Poetry.

Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003.

Rosenberg, Donna. World Mythology. The McGraw-Hill Companies, 1994.

Do you like
this material?Get help to write a similar one

Steinberg, Theodore L. Twentieth-Century Epic Novels. University of Delaware, 2005.

Author: Russell Ransom

in Beowulf

King Arthur and Beowulf: Hero Analysis

We have so large base of authors that we can prepare a unique summary of any book. Don't believe? Check it!

How fast would you like to get it?

0 thoughts on “Compare And Contrast Essay For Beowulf And King Arthur”

    -->

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *